Ten essential elements of a covert op |
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
Ten essential elements of a covert op
By Jon Rappoport
ONE: Compartmentalization.
The tasks necessary to carrying out the operation are divided
among players at different levels. In a successful op, these groups of
players are unaware of each other. They wouldn't be able to confess to
more than their own roles.
And in many cases, the disparate players would never believe
they were part of an op. They would swear they were "doing good"---as,
for example, in medical research that was---unknown to the
researchers---actually designed to obscure a chemical attack on a
population, by locating a virus as the false culprit. By training and by
general stupidity, the researchers are always predisposed to finding a
virus. The last thing on their minds is that they're part of an op.
TWO: Gaining tremendous media coverage for the effect of the
op (even exaggerating the effects), while hiding the cause and the
players who planned it.
THREE: Blaming the wrong people as the originators of the op.
Relentlessly discrediting truth tellers who see what's really going on.
FOUR: Developing and promoting a false cover story to
describe the details of the op; in many cases, those details are wrong.
For example, the famous truck bomb parked at the curb of the Murrah
Federal Building on April 19, 1995, did most assuredly not cause the
human and property destruction that ensued. There were bombs inside the
building.
FIVE: Laying down false trails for investigators and
independent researchers. In the wake of the JFK assassination, we saw
the emergence of many, many "alternative" scenarios. Some of that
"information" was designed to lead into dead-end alleys---after much
time and frustration.
SIX: At least several goals. In any large covert op, there
are a few different objectives, at different levels. For example,
certain players gain an increase in status; profits for the elite
planners; control of market share; demonizing of opponents; general
demoralization of the population. Arguments over "the real purpose" of
an op are often misguided. There was never just one purpose.
SEVEN: Testing public response. After an op, analysts are
tasked with assessing the public reaction. Did most people buy the
official scenario? What objections were raised? Who raised them? An
effort is made to be as precise as possible. What lessons were learned
that can be applied to the next op?
EIGHT: Controlled opposition. This aspect involves
infiltrating independent voices with plants, who try to take charge of
unofficial and truthful narrative and steer it AWAY from the truth.
Among the plants are people who promote the most absurd
theories possible about the op. And then there are those plants who
accuse everyone who doesn't agree with them of being "CIA agents."
Note: Several of these functions are actually carried out by
people who aren't plants at all. They're just crazy and/or desperate
egomaniacs. They obtain their highest degree of satisfaction from making
accusations against innocent people and inventing sleights against
themselves. They live in an unenviable sewer.
NINE: Distraction. After a covert op, the government and the
press will sometimes promote and pump a new story, concerning a
different "sensational event"---and lean on it for a period of time
sufficient to distract the public from the original op.
TEN: Limited hangout. This strategy involves seeding a cover
story with some bit of truth to attract the unwary, in hopes that they
will buy the whole cover. Or, admitting to a watered down piece of truth
about the op itself, to "let off steam" and make it seem as if the
whole op has been exposed.
These ten elements (there are more) are standard. They're not
esoteric. Any intelligence agency deploys them in a variety of
situations.
For the most part, the press simply takes dictation and
reports what front men for covert ops want reported. Of course, the
press is seeded with intell assets.
How does a researcher deal with these ten elements? He drills
down below the cover story to discover the core facts about the op. He
isn't diverted by the distractions and the fake news.
He must be ready to find some mind-boggling truths at the core and accept what he finds.
Having discovered the core, he can then "reverse engineer"
the op and see how it was put together. He can see who benefited at
various levels.
In my 1987-8 investigation of AIDS/HIV, what lay at the core
was the fact that the virus had never been shown to cause anything. Nor
was it a reasonable candidate as a disease agent.
From there, I could assemble the multiple purposes of the op
and see who was benefiting. I could separate the dupes and pawns and
true believers from the actual operators.
My research uncovered a formidable structure of hierarchical power.
Fortunately, I and other independent researchers who were
arriving at different conclusions managed to maintain a cordial
relationship, instead of sniping at each other. The few times I
encountered megalomaniacs, I basically ignored them. It was a good
lesson to learn.
A final note for now: just because ops are covert, that
doesn't mean they are well executed. Quite often the operators make
blunders. In that case, the following cover-up carries the freight of
mistakes and smooths them out by concocting fantasies that are relayed
to the press, and in turn, to the public. And even then, the cover-up
can fail to impress intelligent observers. However, through repetition,
and by using "experts," the mainstream media keeps promoting the cover
story. In the end, it is the sheer monopolistic power of the press that
functions as the ultimate cover.
That is why I named this site no more fake news 16 years ago. Because that blunt power needs to be dismantled.
We are in the middle of a sea change, where that very thing is happening.
|
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment