California vote-fraud scandal blows up
By Jon Rappoport
The watchdog group, Judicial Watch, is threatening to file a
lawsuit if the state government of California doesn't clean up its vast
voting mess.
What mess?
Judicial Watch: "...public records obtained...show 11 California counties have more registered voters than voting-age citizens."
What??
There's more.
"Los Angeles County officials informed us that the total
number of registered voters [in the County] now stands at a number that
is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting
age."
FAR MORE REGISTERED VOTERS THAN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE OF VOTING AGE.
That's doesn't work. That's fraud.
Now add this to the mix. Over a million illegal immigrants
(some say far more) have received driver's licenses in California. All
of them (unless they specifically opt out), are automatically registered
to vote by the Dept. of Motor Vehicles.
Put all this insanity together, and what do you get? A
gigantic number of people who can illegally cast votes. Because, in
California, it's legal to be illegal.
Want to proceed further down the rabbit hole?
It's probable that many illegal immigrants don't vote. If someone wanted to vote FOR them, how would that work?
Not one at a time, unless some sinister organization had at least half a million foot soldiers on call, on Election Day.
But here is a possible clue: electronic voting systems.
Back in 2007, the secretary of state of California ordered a
"Top-to-Bottom Review" of all electronic voting systems currently in use
in California elections.
In other words, up to that time, these systems had been
considered a very fine way to run the vote count. The systems obviously
had been tested and re-tested and checked and approved. They were
already being used in the state of California.
However, astoundingly, all the following electronic systems
were found to contain fatal flaws: Premier Election Solutions (formerly
Diebold); Hart InterCivic; Sequoia Voting Systems; Election Systems and
Software.
The first three systems were disqualified from further
use...and then conditionally re-approved. The fourth system was rejected
altogether.
To suppose that, after this top-to-bottom review in 2007,
everything was quickly fixed is a leap only the foolish and unwary would
take---particularly when we are talking about extremely talented
hackers who could be employed to change election-vote numbers.
I read the California Top-to-Bottom Review. The public
comments section at the end was illuminating. It contained explosive
remarks.
For example, there was a discussion of vendors pretending to
sell certain voting machines to the state of California...but actually
selling other machines...machines that were not certified for use.
Another comment indicated that California lacked a method to
ensure the source code for voting-machine software actually belonged to
software certified by the state.
All in all, there is no guarantee (far from it) that the California voting system is safe or effective or honest.
If someone manipulated the system, and somehow utilized the
huge numbers of illegal immigrants who are registered to vote, as a
cover for falsified numbers...
Who would use illegal immigrants in that way?
You can answer that question.
No comments:
Post a Comment